IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Horizontal inequity comparisons

Listed author(s):
  • Valentino Dardanoni

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies)

  • Peter Lambert,

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies)

When an income tax or tax-benefit system is applied to the distribution of personal incomes, three effects on the distribution of peoples' living standards can be discerned. First, people with equal pre-tax living standard may not receive the same or comparable tax treatment, and in consequence may end up with different post-tax living standards; this would be in violation of classical horizontal equity (HE). Second, is the effect of the tax system as between people with different pre-tax living standards; this is the concern for vertical equity. Finally, the tax system may disturb the rank ordering of people by their living standards from poorest to richest; if this happens, it is in violation of the no-reranking command, often seen in recent literature as an alternative equity criterion to that of classical HE. In this paper, we argue for a new concept of 'purity' in the measurement of horizontal inequity (HI), that renders it independent of the metric for living standards and also of tax system's vertical performance. Specifically, we argue that HI is a property of the taxation process which can be captured as lack of perfect association between pre- and post-tax living standards, and we expound the idea that the HI in different tax systems be compared by transplanting the HI from one tax system into the other, as a mapping between its pre- and post-tax living standard distributions, and then comparing the extent of association. Two appropriate axioms act, in combination, to ensure that HI can indeed be 'transplanted' from one scenario to another. We go on to propose a partial HE ordering, reflecting the desire of a social decision maker that pre- and post-tax living standards should be positively associated, and the more so the better. It quickly emerges that, although Axioms 1 and 2 were introduced for comparability purposes, and are in part classically inspired, in concert they force us into a concern solely for positions (ranks). An implementable procedure based on the 'copula' is derived, which averts the need for transplantation and can be applied to any pair of tax or tax and benefit systems. Statistical inference procedures are discussed, and illustrative empirical exercises are undertaken for the UK, Canadian and Israeli tax and benefit systems. The methodology can be used to compare HI in taxes with that in benefits, and for international, inter-regional and intertemporal comparisons.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Institute for Fiscal Studies in its series IFS Working Papers with number W98/07.

in new window

Date of creation: 01 Oct 1998
Handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:98/07
Contact details of provider: Postal:
The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE

Phone: (+44) 020 7291 4800
Fax: (+44) 020 7323 4780
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Postal: The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:98/07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Emma Hyman)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.