IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ifs/ifsewp/98-07.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Horizontal inequity comparisons

Author

Listed:
  • Valentino Dardanoni

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies)

  • Peter Lambert,

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies)

Abstract

When an income tax or tax-benefit system is applied to the distribution of personal incomes, three effects on the distribution of peoples' living standards can be discerned. First, people with equal pre-tax living standard may not receive the same or comparable tax treatment, and in consequence may end up with different post-tax living standards; this would be in violation of classical horizontal equity (HE). Second, is the effect of the tax system as between people with different pre-tax living standards; this is the concern for vertical equity. Finally, the tax system may disturb the rank ordering of people by their living standards from poorest to richest; if this happens, it is in violation of the no-reranking command, often seen in recent literature as an alternative equity criterion to that of classical HE. In this paper, we argue for a new concept of 'purity' in the measurement of horizontal inequity (HI), that renders it independent of the metric for living standards and also of tax system's vertical performance. Specifically, we argue that HI is a property of the taxation process which can be captured as lack of perfect association between pre- and post-tax living standards, and we expound the idea that the HI in different tax systems be compared by transplanting the HI from one tax system into the other, as a mapping between its pre- and post-tax living standard distributions, and then comparing the extent of association. Two appropriate axioms act, in combination, to ensure that HI can indeed be 'transplanted' from one scenario to another. We go on to propose a partial HE ordering, reflecting the desire of a social decision maker that pre- and post-tax living standards should be positively associated, and the more so the better. It quickly emerges that, although Axioms 1 and 2 were introduced for comparability purposes, and are in part classically inspired, in concert they force us into a concern solely for positions (ranks). An implementable procedure based on the 'copula' is derived, which averts the need for transplantation and can be applied to any pair of tax or tax and benefit systems. Statistical inference procedures are discussed, and illustrative empirical exercises are undertaken for the UK, Canadian and Israeli tax and benefit systems. The methodology can be used to compare HI in taxes with that in benefits, and for international, inter-regional and intertemporal comparisons.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentino Dardanoni & Peter Lambert,, 1998. "Horizontal inequity comparisons," IFS Working Papers W98/07, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:98/07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ifs.org.uk
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Murat GENÇ & Murray SMITH, "undated". "Wage Gaps in the New Zealand Labour Market," EcoMod2008 23800042, EcoMod.
    2. Ivica Urban, 2014. "Contributions of taxes and benefits to vertical and horizontal effects," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(3), pages 619-645, March.
    3. Koen Decancq, 2014. "Copula-based measurement of dependence between dimensions of well-being," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 66(3), pages 681-701.
    4. Murray D Smith, 2004. "Stochastic Frontier Models With Correlated Error Components," Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings 121, Econometric Society.
    5. Harvey, James, 2005. "A note on the 'natural rate of subjective inequality' hypothesis and the approximate relationship between the Gini coefficient and the Atkinson index," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(5-6), pages 1021-1025, June.
    6. Valentino Dardoni & Peter Lambert,, 2000. "Progressivity comparisons," IFS Working Papers W00/18, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    7. Ivica Urban, 2009. "Kakwani decomposition of redistributive effect: Origins, critics and upgrades," Working Papers 148, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    8. Diana, Tony, 2011. "Improving schedule reliability based on copulas: An application to five of the most congested US airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 284-287.
    9. Ivica Urban, 2013. "Implementation Issues in the Duclos–Jalbert–Araar Decomposition of Redistributive Effect," Public Finance Review, , vol. 41(1), pages 121-143, January.
    10. Sergio Rey, 2014. "Fast algorithms for a space-time concordance measure," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 799-811, June.
    11. Duclos, Jean-Yves & Jalbert, Vincent & Araar, Abdelkrim, 2003. "Classical Horizontal Inequity and Reranking: an Integrating Approach," Cahiers de recherche 0306, CIRPEE.
    12. Lambert Peter J. & Thoresen Thor O., 2012. "The Inequality Effects of a Dual Income Tax System," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Peter Lambert & Thor Thoresen, 2009. "Base independence in the analysis of tax policy effects: with an application to Norway 1992–2004," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 16(2), pages 219-252, April.
    14. Maria Giovanna Monti & Simone Pellegrino & Achille Vernizzi, 2015. "On Measuring Inequity in Taxation Among Groups of Income Units," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 61(1), pages 43-58, March.
    15. James Harvey, "undated". "A note on the 'Natural Rate of Subjective Inequality' hypothesis and the approximate relationship between the Gini coefficient and the Atkinson index," Discussion Papers 03/12, Department of Economics, University of York.
    16. Dardanoni, Valentino & Lambert, Peter J., 2002. "Progressivity comparisons," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 99-122, October.
    17. Erlend Bø & Peter Lambert & Thor Thoresen, 2012. "Horizontal inequity under a dual income tax system: principles and measurement," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 19(5), pages 625-640, October.
    18. Casey Quinn, 2005. "Generalisable regression methods for costeffectiveness using copulas," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 05/13, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:98/07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Emma Hyman). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ifsssuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.