IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Endogeneity in count data models; an application to demand for health care

  • Frank Windmeijer

    ()

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies and University of Bristol)

  • Joao Santos Silva

The generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation technique is discussed for count data models with endogenous regressors. Count data models can be specified with additive or multiplicative errors and it is shown that, in general, a set of instruments is not orthogonal to both error types. Simultaneous equations with a dependent count variable often do not have a reduced form which is a simple function of the instruments. However, a simultaneous model with a count and a binary variable can only be logically consistent when the system is triangular. Utilizing data from the British Health and Lifestyle Survey 1991-1992, the GMM estimator is used in the estimation of a model explaining the number of visits to doctors, with a self-reported binary health index as a possible endogenous regressor. If this regressor is truly endogenous, one expects the pseudo-likelihood estimate of its coefficient to be biased upwards. Indeed, for the additive model, the estimated coefficient of the binary health index decreases in value when the possible endogeneity of this regressor is taken into account. Further indication of endogeneity is given by the fact that the overidentifying restrictions are rejected in the multiplicative model, but not in the additive model. Finally, a model that includes predicted latent health instead of the binary health index is estimated in stages.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Institute for Fiscal Studies in its series IFS Working Papers with number W96/15.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: Aug 1996
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:96/15
Contact details of provider: Postal: The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE
Phone: (+44) 020 7291 4800
Fax: (+44) 020 7323 4780
Web page: http://www.ifs.org.uk
Email:


More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Postal: The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE
Email:


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:96/15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Stephanie Seavers)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.