IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Endogeneity in count data models; an application to demand for health care


  • Frank Windmeijer

    () (Institute for Fiscal Studies and University of Bristol)

  • Joao Santos Silva Santos Silva

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies)


The generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation technique is discussed for count data models with endogenous regressors. Count data models can be specified with additive or multiplicative errors and it is shown that, in general, a set of instruments is not orthogonal to both error types. Simultaneous equations with a dependent count variable often do not have a reduced form which is a simple function of the instruments. However, a simultaneous model with a count and a binary variable can only be logically consistent when the system is triangular. Utilizing data from the British Health and Lifestyle Survey 1991-1992, the GMM estimator is used in the estimation of a model explaining the number of visits to doctors, with a self-reported binary health index as a possible endogenous regressor. If this regressor is truly endogenous, one expects the pseudo-likelihood estimate of its coefficient to be biased upwards. Indeed, for the additive model, the estimated coefficient of the binary health index decreases in value when the possible endogeneity of this regressor is taken into account. Further indication of endogeneity is given by the fact that the overidentifying restrictions are rejected in the multiplicative model, but not in the additive model. Finally, a model that includes predicted latent health instead of the binary health index is estimated in stages.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Windmeijer & Joao Santos Silva Santos Silva, 1996. "Endogeneity in count data models; an application to demand for health care," IFS Working Papers W96/15, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:96/15

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:96/15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Emma Hyman). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.