IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ifs/ifsewp/96-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public employment agencies and unemployment spells: reconciling the experimental and non-experimental evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan M. Thomas

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies)

Abstract

According to the econometric literature, unemployed jobseekers who use a Public Employment Agency (PEA) have longer unemployment spells than those choosing alternative search methods. This contrasts sharply with the findings from well-designed US experiments where treatments subject to increased PEA services have shorter spells. We argue that the non-experimental studies are biased towards finding a positive relation as they ignore the possibility that PEA's are chosen after some unemployment has been accumulated. Exploiting UK microdata with information on the timing of PEA usage we present new econometric evidence in line with the experiments. Delays in PEA use can also explain previous econometric findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan M. Thomas, 1996. "Public employment agencies and unemployment spells: reconciling the experimental and non-experimental evidence," IFS Working Papers W96/12, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:96/12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ifs.org.uk
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:96/12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emma Hyman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifsssuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.