IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ifs/ifsewp/12-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing household inflation experiences measured by the CPI and RPI

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Levell

    () (Institute for Fiscal Studies and Institute for Fiscal Studies)

  • Thomas Skingle

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies)

Abstract

In October 2012, the ONS announced a consultation on whether the statistical methods used to calculate the Retail Prices Index (RPI) should be changed to bring them closer in line to those used in the Consumer Prices Index (CPI). Previous IFS work has looked at how inflation rates varied across different households, using survey data on household expenditure to calculate RPI-based measures of household-specific inflation. This paper analyses whether CPI-based measures give similar results and the reasons behind any differences. In doing so, we investigate whether proposed methodological changes to the RPI would have changed our previous results on the difference in inflation rates across household groups had they been implemented before. We find that, after stripping out housing costs, there are only small differences between RPI and CPI-based measures of the gaps between high and low income households and pensioner and non-pensioner households. This suggests that the ‘formula effect’ difference between the two indices doesn’t systematically affect the goods typically consumed by either pensioners or low income households more than the goods typically consumed by non-pensioners and high income households.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Levell & Thomas Skingle, 2012. "Comparing household inflation experiences measured by the CPI and RPI," IFS Working Papers W12/21, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:12/21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ifs.org.uk/wps/wp1221.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CPI; RPI; Inflation;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:12/21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Emma Hyman). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ifsssuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.