Author
Listed:
- Teixeira, Fernanda Z.
- Araya-Gamboa, Daniela
- Gutiérrez Acuña, Susana
- Coelho, Igor P
- Araya Jiménez, Yosette
- Víquez Alvarado, Erick
- Pomareda García, Esther
- Boyat, Silvio
- Salom-Pérez, Roberto
- Arevalo Huezo, Esmeralda
- Picado Valenzuela, Priscila
- Saavedra, Valentina
- González-Mahecha, Esperanza
- Gauto Espinola, Maria Irene
- Ávila Alfaro, Andrea
- Quirós Calderón, Jaime
Abstract
After implementing mitigation measures on road projects, it is critical to assess whether they effectively address the targeted impactsnamely, restrict wildlife movement and mortality from wildlife-vehicle collisions. In this study, we used a control-impact design to answer two key questions: (1) Is the probability of use by terrestrial and arboreal animals similar in crossing structures compared to surrounding forest sites? (2) Is wildlife mortality lower on road sections with mitigation measures than on those without? Our study was conducted on two roads in Costa Rica National Route 160 and National Route 1 focusing on underpasses and canopy bridges. To address the first question, we applied single-season occupancy models to camera trap data for ground-dwelling and arboreal mammals and reptiles, collected both at crossing structures and in surrounding forest. To address the second question, we compared roadkill data collected through vehicle surveys between road segments with and without crossing structures. Our results show that multiple taxa, including ground-dwelling and arboreal species, used structures such as underpasses, box culverts, bridges adapted with dry ledges, and canopy bridges. The probability of use suggests that some species are relatively well adapted to these structures, although confidence intervals remain broad. However, certain species were never recorded using any crossing structures, and, on Route 1, the amount of roadkill was higher for road segments with crossing structures. In conclusion, while wildlife crossing structures show promise in facilitating animal movement across roads, they are insufficient on their own to prevent wildlife mortality, showing that the mitigation system needs improvement. Based on existing best practices, we recommend extending and upgrading the exclusion fence for the underpasses, retrofitting box culverts with dry ledges and exclusion fence and maintenance activities to improve the effectiveness of this mitigation system.
Suggested Citation
Teixeira, Fernanda Z. & Araya-Gamboa, Daniela & Gutiérrez Acuña, Susana & Coelho, Igor P & Araya Jiménez, Yosette & Víquez Alvarado, Erick & Pomareda García, Esther & Boyat, Silvio & Salom-Pérez, Robe, 2026.
"Effectiveness of Crossing Structures for Wildlife on Two Roads Associated with Biological Corridors in Costa Rica,"
IDB Publications (Working Papers)
14517, Inter-American Development Bank.
Handle:
RePEc:idb:brikps:14517
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0013960
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
- Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
- L92 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation
- L73 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - Forest Products
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following
NEP Reports:
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idb:brikps:14517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Felipe Herrera Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iadbbus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.