IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ida/wpaper/wp2604.html

Perceptions of legitimacy in asymmetric decentralisation: evidence from Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Gray

Abstract

This article examines the conditions under which asymmetric decentralisation arrangements that grant enhanced powers to minority-nationalist regions sustain or undermine the legitimacy of the territorial model among the remaining regions, drawing on evidence from Spain. While much scholarship has focused on how asymmetry accommodates minority regions and mitigates secessionist pressures, this study highlights the role of ‘standard regions’. Based on elite interviews in Andalusia, Extremadura, Murcia and the Valencian Community, contextualised with survey data, the findings indicate that asymmetry loses acceptance when it is seen as opaque, system-weakening or generating distributive grievances. Under these conditions, asymmetry risks fuelling renewed territorial tensions rather than fostering stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Gray, 2026. "Perceptions of legitimacy in asymmetric decentralisation: evidence from Spain," IDEAGOV Working Papers WP2604, IDEAGOV - International Center for Decentralization and Governance.
    • Handle: RePEc:ida:wpaper:wp2604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ideagov.eu/RePEc/ida/wpaper/WP2604.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General
    • H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ida:wpaper:wp2604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IDEAGOV - International Center for Decentralization and Governance (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/idusces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.