IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ida/wpaper/wp2603.html

An economic perspective on asymmetric federalism in Canada: the case of Québec

Author

Listed:
  • François Vaillancourt

Abstract

This paper presents the various and unique policy choices made by Québec since WWII and examines their impacts within the context of asymmetric federalism in Canada. Québec is arguably one of the most autonomous subnational governments in industrialised countries. The paper analyses the constitutional and legal framework underlying asymmetry, key manifestations of Québec’s differentiated policies, and the consequences of these arrangements. The findings suggest that asymmetry has strengthened Québec’s francophone identity and contributed to a larger public sector and more equal income distribution relative to Ontario, but provides no evidence of superior economic growth. Asymmetry does not result in greater federal transfers to Québec. For Canada, asymmetric federalism may have reduced secessionist pressures while enabling policy experimentation.

Suggested Citation

  • François Vaillancourt, 2026. "An economic perspective on asymmetric federalism in Canada: the case of Québec," IDEAGOV Working Papers WP2603, IDEAGOV - International Center for Decentralization and Governance.
  • Handle: RePEc:ida:wpaper:wp2603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ideagov.eu/RePEc/ida/wpaper/WP2603.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General
    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ida:wpaper:wp2603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IDEAGOV - International Center for Decentralization and Governance (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/idusces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.