Corruption and Reform? The Emergence of the 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act and the 1906 Meat Inspection Act
This paper explores the origins of federal regulation of food, drugs and meat. We argue that developments in these industries during the late 19th century—technological changes that gave rise to new and cheaper products, the creation of a national market for food and drugs, as well as scientific advance that made it possible for producers to cheapen their food and drugs in ways consumers could not easily perceive—profoundly affected producers, consumers, and bureaucratic officials. In such an environment, regulation of the industry was desired in order to pivot the competitive playing field, but also because of its potential to improve consumer information about product quality. Nevertheless, we find that Congress did not enact a federal law until 1906 because competing producer, bureaucratic, and consumer interests, with different assessments of the benefits of federal regulation, prevented the formation of an effective coalition in favor of federal regulation. We argue that muckraking journalism about the quality of food and drugs played an important role in building a political constituency in favor of federal regulation and in determining the timing of regulatory reform. Corruption in the courts or in the administration of state regulation does not appear to have been a major factor behind the emergence of federal food and drug regulation.
|Date of creation:||Jun 2003|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Corso Unione Sovietica, 218bis - 10134 Torino - Italy|
Phone: +39 011 6706060
Fax: +39 011 6706062
Web page: http://www.esomas.unito.it/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icr:wpicer:20-2003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simone Pellegrino)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.