IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/icr/wpicer/08-2004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Das Ausgleichsprinzip der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft zwischen Solidarität und Korporatismus. Korreferat zum Beitrag von Wolfgang Ockenfels

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Koslowski

Abstract

The Social Market Economy has been seen as a third path between capitalism and socialism shaped by the principle of solidarity. The rhetoric of the third way can be mere mediation as indecisiveness or the consequence of a third conception of the economic order. Solidarism and personalism as the base of the economic system are opposed to individualism and collectivism. Different conceptions of the human person form the basis of different economic systems. Personalism is also a critique of the belief in systems. It claims that the economic order must be based on (multiple) principles, not on the idea of a closed system. A weakness of the Social Market Economy is its belief in personal and corporatist decision-making aiming at consensus between central interest groups. It does not give sufficient consideration to the role of the capital market as the market for corporate control. Paternalism and corporatism of the dominant interest groups are failed developments originating from underrating the control by impersonal competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Koslowski, 2004. "Das Ausgleichsprinzip der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft zwischen Solidarität und Korporatismus. Korreferat zum Beitrag von Wolfgang Ockenfels," ICER Working Papers 08-2004, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:icr:wpicer:08-2004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.bemservizi.unito.it/repec/icr/wp2004/Koslowski8-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nothelle-Wildfeuer Ursula, 2018. "Catholic Social Teaching as a Pillar of Social Market Economy," Journal for Markets and Ethics, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 75-86, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icr:wpicer:08-2004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniele Pennesi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/icerrit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.