IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ico/wpaper/180.html

Pluralising the economic knowledge of politics. Evidence from a German case study

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas Bäuerle

    (Socio-Ecological Transformation Lab, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
    Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
    Department of Socioeconomics, University of Hamburg, Germany)

  • Rouven Reinke

    (Department of Socioeconomics, University of Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

Economic expertise in German policymaking has long been shaped by technocratic, market-liberal advisory bodies closely connected to mainstream economics. Over the past decade, however, an alternative knowledge ecosystem—the New Economy Space (NES)—has emerged, promoting heterodox, pluralist, and impact-orientated approaches to economic policy. Drawing on interviews and organisational documents, this paper maps the internal diversity of the NES and compares it with established advisory configurations. We identify three distinct modes of economic knowledge and political interventions: technical and model-driven expertise within institutionalised advisory bodies, paradigm-driven interventions by neoliberal think tanks, and pragmatic, co-creative, and problem-focused approaches within the NES. While institutionalised actors continue to hold greater resources and formal authority, the NES introduces new topics, actor constellations, and practices into economic policy debates.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas Bäuerle & Rouven Reinke, 2026. "Pluralising the economic knowledge of politics. Evidence from a German case study," ICAE Working Papers 180, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
  • Handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jku.at/fileadmin/gruppen/108/ICAE_Working_Papers/wp180.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Teresa Griesebner The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Teresa Griesebner to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/igjkuat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.