IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/cpaper/95-sr79.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimation of the Usual Daily Intake Distributions of Ratios of Dietary Components. Dietary Assessment Research Series Report 5

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia L. Carriquiry
  • Wayne A. Fuller
  • J. J. Goyeneche

Abstract

Rations of usual intakes of dietary components, such as the percent of calories from fat, are important indicators of dietary adequacy. The authors of this paper discuss the problem of estimating the intake distribution of ratios of dietary components by using an extension of the method developed by Beale (1962). They first estimate the daily ratio of dietary components for each individual to obtain a nearly unbiased ratios estimate and then apply the method developed at Iowa State University to estimate the distribution of usual intakes of the ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia L. Carriquiry & Wayne A. Fuller & J. J. Goyeneche, 1995. "Estimation of the Usual Daily Intake Distributions of Ratios of Dietary Components. Dietary Assessment Research Series Report 5," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 95-sr79, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    • Handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:95-sr79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/95sr79.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=130
    File Function: Online Synopsis
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:mpr:mprres:4777 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Barbara Devaney & Myoung Kim & Alicia Carriquiry & Gabriel Camano-Garcia, 2005. "Assessing the Nutrient Intakes of Vulnerable Subgroups," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 7bec830f54a04b0491011e3ba, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:95-sr79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.