IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/cpaper/15-bp54.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Much Ethanol Can Be Consumed in E85?

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastien Pouliot
  • Bruce A. Babcock

Abstract

EPA's justification for proposing to reduce ethanol mandates in the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) is that consumer demand for ethanol is not high enough to meet the original targets. About 13.7 billion gallons of ethanol can be consumed in E10, which contains 10% ethanol. The original mandate for conventional biofuel (widely assumed to be corn ethanol) was supposed to increase to 15 billion gallons in 2016. This would require that 1.3 billion gallons of ethanol would need to be consumed in gasoline-ethanol blends that contain more than 10% ethanol. The two blends that contain more than 10% ethanol approved for sale are E15 and E85. The number of stations that sell E15 is currently quite small whereas almost 3,000 stations sell E85. Thus EPA focuses on the contribution of potential E85 sales to make its claim that there is insufficient demand for ethanol to support a mandate of 15 billion gallons. EPA writes in its proposed rule: "Thus we believe it is possible for the market to reach volumes perhaps as high as 600 million gallons under favorable pricing conditions" (p. 61). Adding this 600 million gallons to 13.7 billion gallons of ethanol consumed in E10 means that EPA believes that a maximum of 14.3 billion gallons of ethanol can be consumed in the United States. This is why EPA proposes to reduce mandates for the non-advanced biofuel from 15 to 14 billion gallons in 2016. Estimation of the demand for E85 requires data matching various E85 price levels with the corresponding amount of E85 sales. A rich source of data was provided to us that we used to estimate directly the proportion of U.S. owners of flex vehicles who buy E85 at various price points. The data contains daily station fuel sales and prices of a major Midwest chain of retail gasoline outlets. We report on how owners of flex vehicles in two metropolitan areas respond to changes in the price of E85 and extrapolate the results to the national level. Perhaps uniquely, this chain's aggregate market share in these two metro areas was much greater than 90%, thus allowing us to estimate the proportion of owners of flex vehicles in the area who chose to switch from E10 to E85 at various price levels. Using these new direct estimates of consumer demand, we find that owners of current flex vehicles in all US metro areas would consume 250 million gallons of E85 if it was priced at parity on a cost per mile basis with E10, and one billion gallons of ethanol if E85 were priced to save drivers 23% on a cost per mile basis. These estimates assume that no new E85 stations are installed. If new stations were installed so that drivers in metro areas had the same driving distance to an E85 station as drivers do in one of our study areas, then more than one billion gallons of ethanol would be consumed in E85 in US metro areas if E85 were priced to save FFV drivers 10% on a cost per mile basis. These estimates significantly understate total US E85 consumption because consumption in non-metro areas is not included. Our results show that meeting the original 15 billion gallon RFS ethanol target in 2016 is feasible. The two key conditions needed to meet this consumption level is to allow the market for RINs to work as intended, which will allow the price of E85 to fall to induce consumers to buy the fuel, and for EPA to set a consistent policy signal to industry that they will indeed have to meet this target. A clear and consistent message from EPA is needed to foster investment in fueling stations that will allow enough consumers to access E85.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastien Pouliot & Bruce A. Babcock, 2015. "How Much Ethanol Can Be Consumed in E85?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 15-bp54, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:15-bp54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/15bp54.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=1239
    File Function: Online Synopsis
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriel E. Lade, 2019. "E15 Demand and Small Refinery Waivers: A Battle over Long-Run Market Share," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-fall-2019-5, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Janda, Karel & Stankus, Elena, 2017. "Biofuels Markets and Policies in Belarus," MPRA Paper 76725, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Janda, Karel & Stankus, Elena, 2017. "Biofuels Markets and Policies in Ukraine," MPRA Paper 76747, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Gabriel E. Lade & James Bushnell, 2019. "Fuel Subsidy Pass-Through and Market Structure: Evidence from the Renewable Fuel Standard," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(3), pages 563-592.
    5. Chad Hart & Lee L. Schulz, 2019. "Production Projections and Trade Adjustments," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-fall-2019-2, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    6. Gabriel E. Lade & James Bushnell, 2016. "Fuel Subsidy Pass-Through and Market Structure: Evidence from the Renewable Fuel Standard," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 16-wp570, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    7. Janda, Karel & Stankus, Elena, 2017. "Biofuels Markets and Policies in Russia," MPRA Paper 76729, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. John M. Crespi & Chen-Ti Chen, 2019. "Global Competition Made 2018 a Bad Time to Start a Trade War," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-fall-2019-1, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    9. Miguel Carriquiry & Amani Elobeid & Dermot J. Hayes & Wendong Zhang, 2019. "Impact of African Swine Fever on US and World Commodity Markets," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-fall-2019-4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    10. Chris Jones & Philip W. Gassman & Keith E. Schilling, 2019. "The Urgent Need to Address Nutrient Imbalance Problems in Iowa's High-Density Livestock Regions," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-fall-2019-3, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    11. Janda, Karel & Stankus, Elena, 2017. "Quantification of Biofuels Potential of Post-Soviet Countries in the Context of Global Biofuels Development," MPRA Paper 76728, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:15-bp54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.