IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iab/iabfob/202609(en).html

Project Nonprobability Sample Inference: Fieldwork Report

Author

Listed:
  • Drechsler, Jörg

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Fössing, Emma

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Olbrich, Lukas

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Zins, Stefan

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

Abstract

"Probability-based surveys (PS) face increasing pressure due to high costs and low responserates. At the same time, nonprobability-based surveys (NPS) which are presumably cheaper and allow for faster data collection become more and more popular. The Project “Nonprobability Sample Inference” (NOSI) evaluates to which extent NPS may serve as aviable alternative to PS in labor market research by comparing one PS to four NPS collected by different providers. This report provides a brief overview of data collection processes, data quality, and costs of these overall five surveys. The PS involved a 2 × 2 experiment on using incentives and reminders for recruitment. The incentive consisted of a 5 € voucher, while the reminder was a follow-up invitation sent after a two-week delay. Using both an incentive and a reminder increased the response rate by almost 10 percentage points compared to using neither (17.1 vs 7.5 percent). Data collection lasted for 69 days, while the NPS took a maximum of 20 days, with some only taking seven days. For the PS sample, we find that higher-educated, employed, and German individuals are more likely to participate in the survey. Comparing the socio-demographic composition of all samples, we find that respondents without Germany citizenship are widely underrepresented in NPS, while more respondents in the probability-based survey are highly educated. Regarding the employment status, we observe large differences across all samples, also concerning changes in their status. The expected duration of the questionnaire was around ten minutes. The respondents inthe PS had a median duration of approximately ten minutes, while three of four NPS had median durations below six minutes. Attention check failure was higher in the NPS with proportions up to 25 percent. Among three NPS samples, more than 20 percent of the respondents participate in five or more surveys per week. The average costs per completed interview for the PS depend on reminder and incentive usage. Only two of the NPS are cheaper than the PS without incentives and reminders. One NPS is even more expensive than the PS with incentives and reminders." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Suggested Citation

  • Drechsler, Jörg & Fössing, Emma & Olbrich, Lukas & Zins, Stefan, 2026. "Project Nonprobability Sample Inference: Fieldwork Report," IAB-Forschungsbericht 202609 (en), Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
  • Handle: RePEc:iab:iabfob:202609(en)
    DOI: 10.48720/IAB.FB.2609EN
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.48720/IAB.FB.2609EN
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.48720/IAB.FB.2609EN?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabfob:202609(en). See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IAB, Geschäftsbereich Informationsmanagement und Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iabbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.