Author
Listed:
- Helbig, Laura
(Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)
- Hesener, Carlotta
(Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)
- Leber, Ute
(Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)
- Trahms, Annette
(Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)
- Vicari, Basha
(Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)
Abstract
"Despite the great importance of further training in the modern world of work, not all individuals participate in training equally. Our article provides an insight into the structures of training participation and attempts to identify possible barriers. To this end, we present results from the adult study of the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS-SC6) and look at informal learning activities, e.g. reading of specialized literature, as well as non-formal, course-based further training. In our analyses, we differentiate between employed persons and job seekers. Our analyses initially show that participation in further training is closely linked to qualification and age. Higher-qualified persons – neither employed or job seekers – as well as middle-aged people participate more frequently in non-formal further training than lower-qualified and younger or older people. With regard to participation in informal learning activities, however, we only find a correlation for the qualification level, but not for age. There are also differences between non-formal and informal training in terms of gender: Women (job seekers and employed) are more likely to participate in non-formal further training, whereas men are more likely to participate in informal training. In terms of competencies, our analyses show that employees with higher competencies in the areas of reading, math and information and communication technology (ICT) participate more frequently in non-formal and informal training. For the group of job seekers, such a pattern only emerges for informal, but not for non-formal further training. In addition to factors such as qualification, age, gender and competencies, we also consider other characteristics that may represent barriers to participation in further training. We find that participation in further training is closely linked to the individual health status. Poor health appears to be a barrier to participation in further training, particularly in the group of job seekers. In addition, individual expectations of the benefits and costs of further training affect training participation. Hardly surprising, participation in further training is higher when the expected benefits are high and costs are low. According to our analyses, information about further training opportunities also plays an important role. Especially job seekers often feel poorly informed about further training opportunities. The less information there is, the lower the level of participation in further training – both among the employed and the job seekers. Finally, the training motivation is also important for participation, but our study shows that not all people with plans for further training are actually able to implement them. Overall, our analyses indicate that participation in further training is linked to a variety of factors that should be considered when thinking about how to increase training participation. Potential measures to increase training participation include the expansion of advisory and information activities or the provision of digital forms of learning, which could better meet the specific needs of some individuals." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
Suggested Citation
Helbig, Laura & Hesener, Carlotta & Leber, Ute & Trahms, Annette & Vicari, Basha, 2025.
"Weiterbildungsbeteiligung und Weiterbildungshürden bei Arbeitsuchenden und Erwerbstätigen,"
IAB-Forschungsbericht
202526, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
Handle:
RePEc:iab:iabfob:202526
DOI: 10.48720/IAB.FB.2526
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabfob:202526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IAB, Geschäftsbereich Informationsmanagement und Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iabbbde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.