IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal Sex Allocation in Plants and the Evolution of Monoecy


  • Tom de Jong


  • Avi Shmida
  • Frank Thuijsman


Question: Which ecological factors favor the transition from plants with hermaphrodite flowers to monoecious plants with separate male and female flowers on the same individual? Mathematical methods: ESS computation in sex allocation models Key assumptions: Within a flower, costs of attraction, pollen production, style/ovary and fruit with seeds are assumed fixed. Often costs of fruit with seeds outweigh other costs. Female flowers produce more seeds than hermaphrodite flowers, due to less pollen-stigma interference. Conclusions: When sex allocation is female-biased at the flower level, plants respond by producing either male flowers or flowers without fruit. Hermaphroditism evolves to andromonoecy (male and hermaphrodite flowers on the same plant) and then to monoecy. In species with large fruits, sex allocation is female-biased at the flower level and the production of male flowers is favored. This facilitates the production of female flowers. The alternative route via gynomonoecy (female and hermaphrodite flowers on the same plant) is improbable since it requires unrealistically high levels of seed production in female flowers. Monoecious species are likely to have: (i) small, inexpensive flowers, (ii) large, costly fruits and seeds, and (iii) high fertilization rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom de Jong & Avi Shmida & Frank Thuijsman, 2008. "Optimal Sex Allocation in Plants and the Evolution of Monoecy," Discussion Paper Series dp487, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
  • Handle: RePEc:huj:dispap:dp487

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:huj:dispap:dp487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael Simkin). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.