IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The political cost of residual municipal solid waste taxation: perception versus reality

Listed author(s):
  • de Jaeger, Simon


    (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB), KULeuven)

Registered author(s):

    In this paper we set up a stylized theoretical model of consumers’ preference regarding the price for residual municipal solid waste collection and processing services set by the local municipalities. As we are not sure about the information content taken into account by the electorate when judging the incumbents performance, we distinguish between three scenarios prevailing in the political economics literature. In the first scenario a representative consumer maximizes its utility subject to its waste balance equation and its budget constraint. Inspired by the median voter literature, the second scenario adds the local policy makers budget constraint to the basic consumers’ choice problem. In the third scenario we assume the representative consumer compares the price for residual municipal solid waste they pay with the price in neighbouring municipalities and use this price as a yardstick when judging the performance of their incumbent. The predictions from our models are tested using observation for all 308 municipalities in Flanders (Belgium) in 2006 and 2009. The results clearly indicate that consumers hold the local policy makers responsible for residual waste prices, but they do so without using prices in neighbouring municipalities as a yardstick. Political costs in terms of popularity scores rather seem to depend on absolute price levels and (recent) changes in the price levels. Our data also show that local policymakers engage in price mimicking, but apparently this has little influence on re-election chances

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management in its series Working Papers with number 2012/19.

    in new window

    Length: 31 page
    Date of creation: Mar 2012
    Handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:201219
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:201219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sabine Janssens)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.