IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

An empirical analysis of factors related to auditor switching after corporate takeovers

Listed author(s):
  • Luypaert, Mathieu


    (Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School en KU Leuven)

  • Van Caneghem, Tom


    (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB))

Registered author(s):

    In case of a takeover, the acquiring firm has to choose whether to retain the acquired firm’s incumbent auditor or to switch to its own auditor. In the current paper, we explore the drivers of auditor switching by the acquired firm after a takeover among a sample of Belgian takeovers. Employing binary probit regression analysis, we relate different types of variables borrowed from the auditing literature (e.g., similarity of activities between the acquired and the acquiring firm, auditor size, type of audit opinion, agency variables) to the auditor change decision. Our results confirm prior evidence indicating that the majority of acquired firms switch to the auditor of the acquiring firm after the takeover. Whereas prior results are inconclusive, our results suggest that similarity of activities between the acquired and the acquiring firm does not affect the decision to replace the acquired firm’s auditor. However, our results indicate that the likelihood of an auditor switch is significantly higher when the acquiring firm is listed. Agency variables (at both the acquired and the acquiring firm level) are also found to affect the auditor change decision.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management in its series Working Papers with number 2012/03.

    in new window

    Length: 30 page
    Date of creation: Jan 2012
    Handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:201203
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:201203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sabine Janssens)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.