IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Just answering... or thinking? Contrasting pupils' solutions and classifications of missing-value word problems

  • Van Dooren, Wim


    (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)

  • De Bock, Dirk


    (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB), Belgium
    Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)

  • Vleugels, Kim

    (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)

  • Verschaffel, Lieven

    (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)

Registered author(s):

    Upper primary school children often routinely apply proportional methods to missing-value problems, also when this is inappropriate. We tested whether this tendency can be broken if children do not need to produce computational answers to word problems. 75 6th graders were asked to classify 9 word problems (3 proportional, 3 additive, and 3 constant) and to solve a parallel version of these problems. Half of the children (SC-condition) first did the solution and then the classification task, for the others (CS-condition) the order was opposite. On the word problem test, children often over-used proportional methods, but the CS-condition performed better than the SC-condition, suggesting a positive impact of the classification task. On the classification task, most pupils took into account the underlying mathematical models, but they did not always distinguish proportional from non-proportional problems. The SC-condition erformed worse than the CS-condition, suggesting that solving the word problems first negatively affects later classifications.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 500 Can't connect to ( [302 Found]--> If this is indeed the case, please notify (Sabine Janssens)

    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management in its series Working Papers with number 2008/53.

    in new window

    Length: 31 pages
    Date of creation: Nov 2008
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:200853
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:200853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sabine Janssens)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.