IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Students' overuse of linearity: An exploration in physics


  • De Bock, Dirk

    () (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB), Belgium
    Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)

  • Van Dooren, Wim

    (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)

  • Verschaffel, Lieven

    (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)


A vast amount of research in mathematics education has shown that students of different ages have a strong tendency to apply linear or proportional models anywhere, even in situations where they are not applicable. For example, in geometry it is known that many students believe that if the sides of a figure are doubled, the area is doubled too. History of science also provides several cases of thinkers who inadequately postulated linear relations to describe situations. This article focuses on secondary school students’ over-reliance on linearity in physics. Now and then, science educators report students’ tendency to assume and impose linear relations in physics, but – as far as we know – no substantial efforts were undertaken to study this phenomenon in a systematic empirical way. To fill up this hiatus in the science education literature, we report in this article on an empirical investigation aimed at identifying the competence of 8th- and 11th-graders – before and after being taught the relevant physical topics – to qualitatively grasp situations in physics, as well as their tendency to quantify linearly that qualitative insight. The results provide an ambivalent picture of students’ overuse of linearity in physics: although linear reasoning is sometimes used as a default strategy, even after instruction that addresses the relevant physical contents, this study also indicates that context is taken more into account than is suggested by research on mathematical problem solving.

Suggested Citation

  • De Bock, Dirk & Van Dooren, Wim & Verschaffel, Lieven, 2008. "Students' overuse of linearity: An exploration in physics," Working Papers 2008/21, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:200821

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:200821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sabine Janssens). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.