IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hub/wpecon/200805.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Organizational structures: a comparative analysis of ERPS and non-ERPS adopters

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriëls, Xavier

    (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB), Belgium
    Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium)

  • Van de Wiele, Patsy

    (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB), Belgium)

Abstract

The influence of information technology on organizational structures has been extensively discussed in the literature (Hall, 1987; Lincoln and Kalleberg, 1990). Organizational structures typically have to be adapted in order to accommodate a new technology or change in accounting method, instead of the other way around. Lucas and Baroudi (1994) examined complex interactions between decision making and organizational factors, such as integration, formalization and centralization. Although organizational structure has been mainly operationalized in the management accounting literature by centralization, this paper will consider three dimensions of organizational structure, namely formalization, verticalization and centralization. Furthermore, as Gattiker and Goodhue (2004) mention that managing interdependence and improving the flow of information within and between subsidiaries is one of the major reasons many firms have adopted an ERPS, both interdependence levels are also verified in this study. The data for this study were obtained through a survey sent to the 150 largest companies in Belgium. This group consisted of companies having an ERPS and companies which have not adopted an ERPS. This allowed us to compare the above mentioned constructs between ERPS and non-ERPS adopters. Findings indicate stability in organizational structures. Apart from a slight increase in centralization, no changes to organizational structures or interdependence levels could be found.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriëls, Xavier & Van de Wiele, Patsy, 2008. "Organizational structures: a comparative analysis of ERPS and non-ERPS adopters," Working Papers 2008/05, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:200805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://lirias.hubrussel.be/handle/123456789/2230
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:200805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sabine Janssens (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/emhubbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.