IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hpa/wpaper/200303.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Equity in Health Care Funding: Comparison of Expenditures in Ontario to Allocations Based on Population Need

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Hutchison

    (Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University)

  • Vicki Torrance-Rynard

    (Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University)

  • Jeremiah Hurley

    (Department of Economics and Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University)

  • Stephen Birch

    (Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University)

  • John Eyles

    (Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Geography, McMaster University)

  • Stephen D. Walter

    (Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University)

Abstract

Background - The geographic distribution of health care funding in Canada has traditionally been based on past allocations and the distribution of health care facilities and providers. Whether this approach has succeeded in distributing resources among populations in keeping with relative health care needs is unknown. Methods - Using data on self-assessed health status and utilization of health care services from the Ontario Health Survey, data on health care expenditures from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, and population data from Statistics Canada, we compared actual health care expenditures for geographically-defined populations in Ontario to allocations based on relative population need as represented by age, sex and self-assessed health status. Comparisons were made at the regional (Health Region), district (District Health Council) and local (Public Health Unit) levels. Results - Expenditures and needs-based allocations were significantly different for 4 of 7 regions, 9 of 15 districts and 23 of 42 local areas. At the regional level, needs-based allocations ranged from 8.9% higher to 6.4% lower than actual expenditures. For districts, needs-based allocations ranged from 12.9% higher to 9.8% lower than expenditures. At the local level, needs-based allocations ranged from 23.8% higher to 18.8% lower than expenditures. Intraclass correlation coefficients measuring agreement between needs-based per capita expenditures and actual per capita expenditures were 0.86, 0.74 and 0.58 for regions, districts and local areas respectively. Interpretation - Although, on average, the differences between needs-based allocations and actual health care expenditures were not large, the discrepancies were substantial for many geographic areas. The adoption in Ontario of funding methods based on relative population needs would improve equity in the allocation of health care resources to populations and result in a considerable redistribution of resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Hutchison & Vicki Torrance-Rynard & Jeremiah Hurley & Stephen Birch & John Eyles & Stephen D. Walter, 2003. "Equity in Health Care Funding: Comparison of Expenditures in Ontario to Allocations Based on Population Need," Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series 2003-03, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Handle: RePEc:hpa:wpaper:200303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.chepa.org/Files/Working%20Papers/03-03.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2003
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hpa:wpaper:200303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lyn Sauberli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chepaca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.