IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Case Study Methodology for Studying Financial Incentives in Context

Listed author(s):
  • Mita Giacomini


    (Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University)

  • L Goldsmith

    (Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University)

Registered author(s):

    This paper describes a method for the case study of financial incentives in health care systems. This approach is for applying a conceptual framework that describes funding changes -- and their transformation into “financial incentives” that change behaviour -- as a communication process rather than as a behavioural conditioning exercise. The “cases” in question were changes in health system funding. The two initial research questions were: given a funding change, 1) what policy making process produced the payment policy, and what were its features, and, 2) how did affected organizations interpret this financial “signal” and respond in ways that might give insight into its “incentive” properties? Empirical study was divided into several phases, including I) the description of the funding policy; II) investigation into the origin of the policy; III) identification of affected stakeholders and investigation of their interpretations of and responses to the funding change. Data sources primarily consisted of documents and interviews. Analysis focused on: 1) describing the case, its evolution, and its policy interest; 2) describing any concrete consequences of the funding change; 3) generating analytic categories such as stakeholder coalitions and themes in their interpretation of the policy messages carried by the funding change. We used several methods of triangulation to verify both the “facts” and the conclusions drawn from them, including data source triangulation, investigator triangulation, theory triangulation, methodological triangulation, and member-checking.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: First version, 1996
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada in its series Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series with number 1996-15.

    in new window

    Length: 30 pages
    Date of creation: 1996
    Handle: RePEc:hpa:wpaper:199615
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    CRL Building, 282, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1

    Phone: (905) 525-9140, extension 22122
    Fax: (905) 546-5211
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hpa:wpaper:199615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lyn Sauberli)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.