Revolving Doors and Regulatory Complexity
Regulators often go on to lucrative careers either working for, or selling advice to, the industry they previously policed. We investigate the implications of this phenomenon for the design of regulatory institutions. The policy response of cooling-off periods (as used in the UK, US, France and elsewhere) is often welfare-reducing. Capping advisory fees is shown to be a better solution.
|Date of creation:||Feb 2000|
|Date of revision:||Feb 2000|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.|
Phone: +44 1784-414228
Fax: +44 1784-439534
Web page: http://www.rhul.ac.uk/economics/
|Order Information:|| Postal: Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hol:holodi:9901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Claire Blackman)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Claire Blackman to update the entry or send us the correct email address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.