IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Choice-Consistent Resolutions of the Efficiency-Equity Trade-Off


  • Tadenuma, Koichi


In a standard framework of choice theory, we formulate two contrasting principles for social choice under the efficiency-equity trade-off. The equity-first principle states that we should select from equitable allocations if any, but if the equity criterion is not at all effective for selection either because all the available allocations are equitable or because no allocation is equitable, we should select from Pareto efficient allocations. The efficiency-first principle switches the roles of the equity criterion and the efficiency criterion above. We examine the choice-consistency properties, known as Path Independence (Arrow, 1963) and Contraction Consistency (Chernoff, 1954), of the social choice correspondences satisfying the equity-first or the efficiency-first principle. Several possibility and impossibility theorems are obtained, which indicate that possibility of consistent social decisions depends crucially on which principle we take as well as what is the precise notion of equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Tadenuma, Koichi, 2007. "Choice-Consistent Resolutions of the Efficiency-Equity Trade-Off," Discussion Papers 2007-09, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
  • Handle: RePEc:hit:econdp:2007-09

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Kotaro Suzumura, 1994. "Interpersonal Comparisons of the Extended Sympathy Type and the Possibility of Social Choice," Discussion Paper Series a295, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Yukihiro Nishimura, 2008. "Fair Collective Choice Rules: Their Origin and Relationship," Working Papers 1179, Queen's University, Department of Economics.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hit:econdp:2007-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Digital Resources Section, Hitotsubashi University Library). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.