IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/50-law-2015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Secession Versus Self-Determination: Some Critical Remarks on Contemporary Theories

Author

Listed:
  • Rodion Yu. Belkovich

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

From the beginning of the 1980s the problem of secession has become one of the most discussed topics among the political theory scholars in Western academia. Two main groups of theories which accept secession as a legitimate and morally permissible form of political action have emerged since then: remedial (or just-cause) theories and “liberal” theories. The remedial theories regard secession as a remedy which can be used against the injustices a group suffers within a state The liberal theories grant any territorially organised group a right to secede and form a new state if the latter complies with the requirements we usually demand of a contemporary democratic regime. What is common for both theories is their open acclaim of the right of self-determination. The study seeks to show that a theory of secession based on a self-determination principle must adopt a substantially wider understanding of secession than both of these theories can offer – a one which does not require a creation of a new state as a result.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodion Yu. Belkovich, 2015. "Secession Versus Self-Determination: Some Critical Remarks on Contemporary Theories," HSE Working papers WP BRP 50/LAW/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:50/law/2015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2015/04/09/1094994313/50LAW2015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    secession; self-determination; sovereignty; remedial theories; independence;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z19 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:50/law/2015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.