IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/10-law-2013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Global legal pluralism: A new way of legal thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail Antonov

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics (St. Petersburg, Russia))

Abstract

The subject matter of this article is the terminology which is used in contemporary law and sociological jurisprudence to denote changes in legal regulation. Among the most fashionable terms are those of globalization and pluralism. In the author’s opinion, these two terms indicate diverse phenomena and have different tasks. Pluralism is a concept allowing the description and explication of various legal facts, institutions, relations which are not generally recognized in state-centered theory of law. Globalization is a common name for the distinctive characteristics which distinguish the present-day Western civilization from other civilizations. The amalgamation of these two different aspects into one set of methods and ideas inspired by the need to explain modernity does not lead to the formation of a new methodology or of a scientific conception. Rather globalization talks about plurality in contemporary law having another function – to describe the changing mentality, new ways of legal thinking which are growing in the Western world. These changes have repercussions in many fields of science, i.e. in a new understanding of such traditional concepts as sovereignty

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail Antonov, 2013. "Global legal pluralism: A new way of legal thinking," HSE Working papers WP BRP 10/LAW/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:10/law/2013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2013/01/31/1304672864/10LAW2013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    legal pluralism; globalization; legal orders; transnational law; civilization; sociological jurisprudence; sustainability.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K1 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:10/law/2013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.