IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hic/wpaper/450.html

A nation on the edge: Nigerians’ views on kidnapping

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Tuki

Abstract

Although much research has examined armed banditry and kidnapping in Nigeria, they focus primarily on the causes of these forms of insecurity and often rely on secondary sources or single local case studies. As a result, there is a notable lack of nationally representative evidence on how Nigerians perceive kidnapping. Using large-N Afrobarometer survey data collected in Nigeria in 2024, this study provides a descriptive analysis of public attitudes toward kidnapping and trust in security providers. The findings show that kidnapping is Nigerians’ leading security concern, with nearly one in three people reporting that they personally know someone who has been kidnapped in the past five years. The analysis further reveals limited trust in the police: when faced with security threats, Nigerians are most likely to turn to community leaders or traditional authorities, followed by neighborhood vigilante groups, with the police ranking third. These results highlight the central role of public trust in shaping civilian responses to kidnapping and armed banditry. They also suggest that state efforts to address insecurity in Nigeria depend not only on expanding security capacity but on restoring confidence in formal security institutions, especially the police.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Tuki, 2026. "A nation on the edge: Nigerians’ views on kidnapping," HiCN Working Papers 450, Households in Conflict Network.
  • Handle: RePEc:hic:wpaper:450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hicn.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/HiCN-WP-450.pdf
    File Function: Full PDF document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hic:wpaper:450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tilman Brück or the person in charge or the person in charge or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hicn.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.