IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Mutual Sharing or Insurance? An Experimental Study of Decisions at Various Levels of Uncertainty

Listed author(s):
  • Ahmed, Ali M.


    (Centre for Labour Market Policy Research (CAFO))

  • Skogh, Göran


    (University of Linköping)

Registered author(s):

    Decision theory assumes that agents making choices assign subjective probabilities to outcomes, also at choices where information on probabilities is obviously absent. Yet, Skogh and Wu (2005) show that risk averse agents may gain by risk sharing also at unknown (and unassigned) probabilities of losses, as long as the agents presume that the risks are equal. Their Restated diversification theorem is tested by an experiment where the players may lose half their endowments in each of five risky rounds. The probability of loss, and the information about this probability, varies with the rounds. The result supports the hypothesis of beneficial risk sharing at genuine uncertainty. Moreover, the result tentatively supports an evolutionary theory of the development of the insurance industry starting with mutual pooling at uncertainty, turning into insurance priced ex ante when actuarial information is available.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Centre for Labour Market Policy Research (CAFO), School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University in its series CAFO Working Papers with number 2006:12.

    in new window

    Length: 25 pages
    Date of creation: 12 Nov 2006
    Handle: RePEc:hhs:vxcafo:2006_012
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Centre for Labour Market Policy Research (CAFO), School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University, SE 351 95 Växjö, Sweden

    Phone: +46 470 70 87 64
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:vxcafo:2006_012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Andreas Mångs)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.