IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/ratioi/0247.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

EU:s Janusansikte

Author

Listed:
  • Karlson, Nils

    (The Ratio institute)

Abstract

Dagens Europeiska Union (EU) framstår för många betraktare och väljare som motsägelsefullt och otydligt. Vissa inslag är positiva – andra mer negativa . Inte minst finns det en kritik mot EU:s ökade överstatlighet. M en främst uppfattas EU och EU:s roll och uppdrag som oklart. Konsekvensen är bristande legitimitet och populism. I denna artikel visas att EU kan sägas ha något av ett Janusansikte, en dubbelnatur, som det är nödvändigt att ta ställning ti ll. Europasamarbetets tillkomst och fortsatta utveckling baseras på två olika grundläggande idéer om hur fred och ekonomisk utveckling kan säkras, vilka har olika konsekvenser för bl.a. synen på federalism, legitimitet och frågan om vilket EU vi vill ha. D en ena idén är pluralistisk, den andra centralistisk.

Suggested Citation

  • Karlson, Nils, 2014. "EU:s Janusansikte," Ratio Working Papers 247, The Ratio Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ratio.se/app/uploads/2014/12/ka_eu_janus.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Europeiska Unionen; integration; maktdelning; konstitutionalism; Churchill; Monnet;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F43 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Economic Growth of Open Economies
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Korpi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ratiose.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.