IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Financial Block in the Econometric Model KOSMOS


  • Markowski, Aleksander

    () (National Institute of Economic Research)


The model includes seven sectors (Central Bank, central government, banks mortgage institutions, private and social insurance, non-financial business and households, foreign) and nine asset categories (certificates, bonds, bank deposits, loans, equity, net foreign assets, notes and coin, insurance savings and claims on the National Savings Scheme). Emphasis was laid on modelling demand for bonds and certificates, which in turn affects the bond rate and the money stock. Sector demand for equity is - with two exceptions - determined exogenously, due to problems with modelling yield on equity and changes in market value. Despite the relatively large number of assets the model is rather simple, any refinements having been left to subsequent model versions. The approach is eclectic. At the core of it lies the portfolio balance model, but the portfolio in question is defined narrowly to include only net foreign assets, certificates, bonds and (bank deposit) money. The remaining assets are assumed to be acquired for other reasons than pure portfolio investment and their purchase is assumed to be effected before any portfolio decision is taken. Furthermore, the portfolio choice is assumed to take place in two steps, the first decision referring to the choice between foreign and domestic assets. The model`s data base consists of a flow-of-funds matrix (or its stock-value counterpart) derived from the Financial Accounts published by Statistics Sweden. Annual Financial Accounts time series for 1986-94 were distributed by half-years (and in some instances quarters) using other sources, in particular the data compiled by the Central Bank. Despite much effort, we were not always able to reconcile time series coming from different sources. The quality of the data is in some respects rather poor, although a major effort has been made to compile a good statistical data base for the project. One of the problems, but definitely not the only one, is the uncertainty regarding the extent to which assets are reported at market value as opposed to nominal value. The poor quality of the data and the limited number of observations available affected the estimation strategy. While statistical inference often is difficult in small samples (in particual when only asymptotic distributions for the test variables are known), data problems and apparent measurement errors made test results the more dubious. In formulating equations, theory and considerations relating to the desired simulation properties of the model were given precedence over test results. Furthermore, the OLS estimator was employed, since instrumental variable methods can result in large small-sample bias when instruments are correlated with the error term or are only weakly correlated with the endogenous explanatory variables (cf. Bound, Jaeger and Baker (1995)). Standard computer printout is shown for all the equations as a general information for the reader. A rather uncommon approach was employed in order to improve the reliability of the estimates. Regressions were - whenever possible - based on quarterly data, the resultant equations being subsequently transformed into semi-annual form to conform with the requirements of KOSMOS. To this end, a theory of temporal aggregation of equations was developed in Ruist (1996)). The structure of the paper is as follows. A theoretical portfolio model is outlined in the next chapter. Thereafter, the empirical model is described in general terms. The two subsequent chapter deal with the determination of the exchange rate and of the interest rates, respectively. The seven final chapters deal with the seven sectors of the model, giving an account of the demand for and supply of assets by sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Markowski, Aleksander, 1996. "The Financial Block in the Econometric Model KOSMOS," Working Papers 53, National Institute of Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:nierwp:0053

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Jaffe Adam B. & Stavins Robert N., 1995. "Dynamic Incentives of Environmental Regulations: The Effects of Alternative Policy Instruments on Technology Diffusion," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 43-63, November.
    2. Anderson, Soren T. & Newell, Richard G., 2004. "Information programs for technology adoption: the case of energy-efficiency audits," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 27-50, March.
    3. Khanna, Madhu & Zilberman, David, 1997. "Incentives, precision technology and environmental protection," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 25-43, October.
    4. Suzi Kerr & Richard G. Newell, 2003. "Policy-Induced Technology Adoption: Evidence from the U.S. Lead Phasedown," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 317-343, September.
    5. Löfgren, Åsa & Millock, Katrin & Nauges, Céline, 2007. "Using Ex Post Data to Estimate the Hurdle Rate of Abatement Investments - An Application to the Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry and Energy Sector," Working Papers in Economics 249, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    6. Askildsen, Jan Erik & Jirjahn, Uwe & Smith, Stephen C., 2006. "Works councils and environmental investment: Theory and evidence from German panel data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 346-372, July.
    7. Stavins, Robert & Jaffe, Adam & Newell, Richard, 2000. "Technological Change and the Environment," Working Paper Series rwp00-002, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    8. Pindyck, Robert S., 2000. "Irreversibilities and the timing of environmental policy," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 233-259, July.
    9. Margaret Insley, 2003. "On the option to invest in pollution control under a regime of tradable emissions allowances," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 36(4), pages 860-883, November.
    10. Bruce Larson & George Frisvold, 1996. "Uncertainty over future environmental taxes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 8(4), pages 461-471, December.
    11. Valentina Bosetti, Carlo Carraro and Marzio Galeotti, 2006. "The Dynamics of Carbon and Energy Intensity in a Model of Endogenous Technical Change," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 191-206.
    12. Jaffe, Adam B. & Newell, Richard G. & Stavins, Robert N., 2005. "A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2-3), pages 164-174, August.
    13. Pindyck, Robert S, 1993. "A Note on Competitive Investment under Uncertainty," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(1), pages 273-277, March.
    14. Kevin A. Hassett & Gilbert E. Metcalf, 1992. "Energy Tax Credits and Residential Conservation Investment," NBER Working Papers 4020, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Grubler, Arnulf & Nakicenovic, Nebojsa & Victor, David G., 1999. "Dynamics of energy technologies and global change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 247-280, May.
    16. Katrin Millock & Céline Nauges, 2006. "Ex Post Evaluation of an Earmarked Tax on Air Pollution," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 82(1), pages 68-84.
    17. Frondel, Manuel & Horbach, Jens & Rennings, Klaus, 2004. "End-of-Pipe or Cleaner Production? An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Innovation Decisions Across OECD Countries," ZEW Discussion Papers 04-82, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
    18. Leigh J. Maynard & James S. Shortle, 2001. "Determinants of Cleaner Technology Investments in the U.S. Bleached Kraft Pulp Industry," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(4), pages 561-576.
    19. Lundmark, Robert & Soderholm, Patrik, 2004. "Estimating and decomposing the rate of technical change in the Swedish pulp and paper industry: A general index approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 17-35, September.
    20. Hassett, Kevin A. & Metcalf, Gilbert E., 1995. "Energy tax credits and residential conservation investment: Evidence from panel data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 201-217, June.
    21. Paul Diederen & Frank van Tongeren & Hennie van der Veen, 2003. "Returns on Investments in Energy-saving Technologies Under Energy Price Uncertainty in Dutch Greenhouse Horticulture," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 24(4), pages 379-394, April.
    22. Hassett, Kevin A. & Metcalf, Gilbert E., 1993. "Energy conservation investment : Do consumers discount the future correctly?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 710-716, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Ruist, Erik, 1996. "Temporal Aggregation of an Econometric Equation," Working Papers 52, National Institute of Economic Research.
    2. Kragh, Börje & Markowski, Aleksander, 1998. "KOFI - A Macromodel of the Swedish Financial Markets," Working Papers 60, National Institute of Economic Research.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:nierwp:0053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sarah Hegardt Grant). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.