IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/iuiwop/1539.html

Tax-Motivated Firm Splitting

Author

Listed:

Abstract

How do corporate tax systems shape the boundaries of the firm? This paper shows that nonlinear corporate income taxation can distort firms’ organizational structures by inducing tax-motivated firm splitting. I use administrative data on corporations and their owners and exploit two reforms that altered the tax benefits and costs of dividing a firm into multiple entities. First, I show that a temporary increase in the tax advantage of splitting reduces the share of firms filing jointly for corporate income tax purposes. Second, once the benefit is perceived as permanent and minimum capital requirements for new firms are abolished, the number of firms per entrepreneur rises significantly and persistently. Finally, I show that reorganizations are primarily driven by tax motives, as I find no effect on firms’ total assets, employment, or industry diversification. These findings highlight extensive-margin responses of business organization to corporate taxation, with relevant implications for the understanding of firm dynamics and for tax design.

Suggested Citation

  • Massenz, Gabriella, 2025. "Tax-Motivated Firm Splitting," Working Paper Series 1539, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:1539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifn.se/wfiles/wp/wp1539.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaroslav Bukovina & Tomáš Lichard & Ján Palguta & Branislav Žúdel, 2025. "Corporate Minimum Tax and the Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence from Administrative Tax Records," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 358-387, May.
    2. Henrik Kleven & Claus Kreiner & Kristian Larsen & Jakob Søgaard, 2025. "Micro versus Macro Labor Supply Elasticities: The Role of Dynamic Returns to Effort," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 115(9), pages 2849-2890, September.
    3. Henrik Kleven & Claus Kreiner & Kristian Larsen & Jacob Soegaard, 2025. "Micro vs Macro Labor Supply Elasticities: The Role of Dynamic Returns to Effort," CEBI working paper series 25-03, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    4. Helen Miller & Thomas Pope & Kate Smith, 2024. "Intertemporal Income Shifting and the Taxation of Business Owner-Managers," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(1), pages 184-201, January.
    5. Raj Chetty & John N. Friedman & Tore Olsen & Luigi Pistaferri, 2011. "Adjustment Costs, Firm Responses, and Micro vs. Macro Labor Supply Elasticities: Evidence from Danish Tax Records," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 126(2), pages 749-804.
    6. Michael Keane & Richard Rogerson, 2015. "Reconciling Micro and Macro Labor Supply Elasticities: A Structural Perspective," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 89-117, 08.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massenz, Gabriella, 2023. "On the behavioral effects of tax policy," Other publications TiSEM eb44a9f7-b859-480d-b2e4-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Dustin L. Swonder & Damián Vergara, 2025. "A Sufficient Statistics Approach to Optimal Corporate Taxes," NBER Working Papers 34517, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Bilicka, Katarzyna & Raei, Sepideh, 2023. "Output distortions and the choice of legal form of organization," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Drahomir Klimsa & Robert Ullmann, 2023. "Threshold-dependent tax enforcement and the size distribution of firms: evidence from Germany," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(4), pages 1002-1035, August.
    5. Claudio Agostini & Zareh Asatryan & Laurent Bach & Govindadeva Bernier & Marinho Bertanha & Katarzyna A. Bilicka & Anne Brockmeyer & Jaroslav Bukovina & Guillermo Falcone & Pablo Garriga & Yuxuan He &, 2026. "The Elasticity of Corporate Taxable Income Across Countries," NBER Working Papers 34945, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Asatryan, Zareh & Peichl, Andreas, 2016. "Responses of firms to tax, administrative and accounting rules: Evidence from Armenia," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-065, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Jaroslav Bukovina & Tomáš Lichard & Ján Palguta & Branislav Žúdel, 2025. "Corporate Minimum Tax and the Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence from Administrative Tax Records," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 358-387, May.
    8. Lejour, Arjan & Massenz, Gabriella, 2020. "Income Shifting and Organizational Form Choice : Evidence from Europe," Other publications TiSEM 3138edef-d645-4113-9981-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Wian Boonzaaier & Jarkko Harju & Tuomas Matikka & Jukka Pirttilä, 2019. "How do small firms respond to tax schedule discontinuities? Evidence from South African tax registers," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 26(5), pages 1104-1136, October.
    10. Philippe Aghion & Maxime Gravoueille & Matthieu Lequien & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2017. "Tax Simplicity or Simplicity of Evasion? Evidence from Self-Employment Taxes in France," NBER Working Papers 24049, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Bussy, Adrien, 2023. "Corporate tax evasion: Evidence from international trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    12. Li Liu & Ben Lockwood & Miguel Almunia & Eddy H. F. Tam, 2021. "VAT Notches, Voluntary Registration, and Bunching: Theory and U.K. Evidence," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 103(1), pages 151-164, March.
    13. Kaoru Hosono & Masaki Hotei & Daisuke Miyakawa, 2024. "The interaction of a size-dependent tax policy and financial frictions: evidence from a tax reform in Japan," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1293-1320, October.
    14. Louis Kaplow, 2024. "Optimal Income Taxation," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 637-738, June.
    15. Irene Di Marzio & Sauro Mocetti & Enrico Rubolino, 2024. "The market externalities of tax evasion," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1467, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    16. Rauhanen, Timo & Harju, Jarkko & Matikka, Tuomas, 2016. "The effects of size-based regulation on small firms: evidence from VAT threshold," Working Papers 75, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    17. Michele Bernasconi & Irene Maria Buso & Anna Marenzi & Dino Rizzi, 2025. "Tax Notches in the Lab: Disentangling Real and Evasion Responses," Working Papers 2025: 15, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    18. Brockmeyer,Anne & Hernandez,Marco, 2016. "Taxation, information, and withholding : evidence from Costa Rica," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7600, The World Bank.
    19. Waseem, Mazhar, 2018. "Taxes, informality and income shifting: Evidence from a recent Pakistani tax reform," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 41-77.
    20. Dina Pomeranz & José Vila-Belda, 2019. "Taking State-Capacity Research to the Field: Insights from Collaborations with Tax Authorities," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 755-781, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • H32 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Firm

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:1539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elisabeth Gustafsson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iuiiise.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.