IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Methodological issues in applying Location Models to Rural areas

Listed author(s):
  • Carling, Kenneth

    (Dalarna University)

  • Han, Mengjie

    (Dalarna University)

  • Håkansson, Johan


    (HUI Research)

Registered author(s):

    Location Models are used for planning the location of multiple service centers in order to serve a geographically distributed population. A cornerstone of such models is the measure of distance between the service center and a set of demand points, viz, the location of the population (customers, pupils, patients and so on). Theoretical as well as empirical evidence support the current practice of using the Euclidian distance in metropolitan areas. In this paper, we argue and provide empirical evidence that such a measure is misleading once the Location Models are applied to rural areas with heterogeneous transport networks. This paper stems from the problem of finding an optimal allocation of a pre-specified number of hospitals in a large Swedish region with a low population density. We conclude that the Euclidian and the network distances based on a homogenous network (equal travel costs in the whole network) give approximately the same optimums. However network distances calculated from a heterogeneous network (different travel costs in different parts of the network) give widely different optimums when the number of hospitals increases. In terms of accessibility we find that the recent closure of hospitals and the in-optimal location of the remaining ones has increased the average travel distance by 75% for the population. Finally, aggregation the population misplaces the hospitals by on average 10 km

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by HUI Research in its series HUI Working Papers with number 62.

    in new window

    Length: 16 pages
    Date of creation: 17 Apr 2012
    Handle: RePEc:hhs:huiwps:0062
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    HUI Research, Regeringsgatan 60, 103 29 Stockholm, Sweden

    Phone: +46 (0)8 762 72 80
    Fax: +46 (0)8 679 76 06
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:huiwps:0062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Helena Nilsson)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.