IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Scandinavian Monetary Cooperation 1873-1914: A trade off between efficiency and vulnerability

Listed author(s):
  • Talia, Krim


    (Dept. of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics)

Registered author(s):

    This Paper examines monetary cooperation among the Scandinavian central banks during the union period. In 1885, the Scandinavian Currency Union was strengthened by the adoption of a clearing agreement. The agreement was proposed by the Danish Nationalbank, with the aim of improving the efficiency of inter Scandinavian monetary transactions. It gave the central banks the right to draw commission free checks on each other. In theory, this clearing agreement eliminated the gold points among the three Scandinavian countries, thus maintaining their currencies at par. A further step was taken in 1894 when the Swedish Riksbank and Norges Bank agreed to accept each other’s notes at par, an arrangement joined by the Danish Nationalbank in 1901. This, however, marked the high point of Scandinavian monetary cooperation. In 1905 Sweden gave notice of termination of the clearing agreement, and only after three months of intense negotiations were the three banks able to compromise on a new, more restrictive, clearing mechanism. The paper argues that monetary cooperation involved a trade off between financial efficiency and economic vulnerability. It establishes that the cancellation of the original agreement can not be attributed solely to the political conflict between Sweden and Norway that raged in 1905. The Swedish Riksbank had for some time been irritated that the agreement had not been performing the function for which it was originally intended. This irritation, however, did not, reach the point of triggering withdrawal from the agreement, until Norway dissolved the political union between the two countries. This act increased the risk for the Riksbank of holding part of its gold reserves in the Norwegian national bank and thus served as a catalyst for the renegotiation of the clearing agreement. The new agreement was less efficient, but also less risky.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Paper provided by Stockholm School of Economics in its series SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance with number 607.

    in new window

    Length: 44 pages
    Date of creation: 10 Jun 2004
    Handle: RePEc:hhs:hastef:0607
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 6501, 113 83 Stockholm, Sweden

    Phone: +46-(0)8-736 90 00
    Fax: +46-(0)8-31 01 57
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:hastef:0607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Helena Lundin)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.