Relative Efficiency of a Quantile Method for Estimating Parameters in Censored Two-Parameter Weibull Distributions
n simulation studies the computer time can be much reduced by using censoring. Here a simple method based on quantiles (Q method) is compared with the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method when estimating the parameters in censored two-parameter Weibull distributions. The ML estimates being obtained using the SAS procedure NLMIXED. It is demonstrated that the estimators obtained by the Q method are less efficient than the ML estimators, but this can be compensated for by increasing the sample size whi... morech nevertheless requires much less computer time than the ML method. The ML estimates can only be obtained by an iterative process and this opens the possibility for failures in the sense that reasonable estimates are presented as unreliable, or anomalous estimates are presented as reliable. Such anomalies were never obtained with the Q method.
|Date of creation:||04 Feb 2011|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Statistical Research Unit, University of Gothenburg, Box 640, SE 40530 GÖTEBORG|
Web page: http://www.statistics.gu.se/
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:gunsru:2010_003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Linus Schiöler)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.