IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Relative Efficiency of a Quantile Method for Estimating Parameters in Censored Two-Parameter Weibull Distributions

Listed author(s):
  • Jonsson, Robert


    (Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg)

Registered author(s):

    n simulation studies the computer time can be much reduced by using censoring. Here a simple method based on quantiles (Q method) is compared with the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method when estimating the parameters in censored two-parameter Weibull distributions. The ML estimates being obtained using the SAS procedure NLMIXED. It is demonstrated that the estimators obtained by the Q method are less efficient than the ML estimators, but this can be compensated for by increasing the sample size whi... morech nevertheless requires much less computer time than the ML method. The ML estimates can only be obtained by an iterative process and this opens the possibility for failures in the sense that reasonable estimates are presented as unreliable, or anomalous estimates are presented as reliable. Such anomalies were never obtained with the Q method.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Statistical Research Unit, Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg in its series Research Reports with number 2010:3.

    in new window

    Length: 25 pages
    Date of creation: 04 Feb 2011
    Handle: RePEc:hhs:gunsru:2010_003
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Statistical Research Unit, University of Gothenburg, Box 640, SE 40530 GÖTEBORG

    Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:gunsru:2010_003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Linus Schiöler)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.