IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Network routines and change of network configuration

  • Lindstrand, Angelika

    (Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University)

Registered author(s):

    The business opportunities that arise for a firm induce it to consider how useful its existing capabilities and knowledge are when seeking opportunities. Firm knowledge and capabilities have been shown to be dependent on the firm’s business network. In this paper we discuss that firms, by learning how to do business and how to acquire needed knowledge through interaction with its network, develop routines that are specific for handling the network. Firms also learn which network configuration provides the most benefit. The routinization of this knowledge leads to specific network configurations, which is viewed as the firms existing capabilities to exploit business opportunities. The purpose of this paper is thus, to develop a conceptual framework for understanding how a firm’s business opportunities influence its perceived usefulness of network routines and how this perception will influence its learning, performance and network configuration. We seek to fill a research gap in our knowledge of network routines and their effects on firm performance and network configuration. We argue that business opportunities guide the firm’s perceived usefulness of its network routines, and that network routines, as realizations of the firm’s theory-in-use, guide the firm’s perception of useful knowledge in learning processes to come. What a firm perceives as its current successfully applied options, with respect to similar situations in the past, will thus affect what other knowledge the firm perceives as useful. Such theory-in-use is related to the firm’s network routines and network configuration. Changes in network routines and network configuration, instigated by double loop learning, is then discussed.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies in its series Occasional Papers with number 2003/2.

    in new window

    Length: 22 pages
    Date of creation: 23 Sep 2003
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:hhb:uufeop:0302
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University, Box 513, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden
    Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:uufeop:0302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sune Karlsson)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.