Development and Modernity in Hofstede's Culture's Consequences: A Postcolonial Reading
Along with an increasingly globalized business environment and a strongly held corporate belief that the world can be rationally managed, the last two decades have witnessed a growing demand for normative models dealing with cross-cultural management issues. This trend has allowed cross-cultural management to establish itself as a significant research field, with much of the initial inspiration coming from Hofstede and his cultural model from 1980. In this paper, our intention is not to merely repeat the already formulated objections to the latter model concerning its ontology, epistemology and methodology, but rather to focus on the very words of Hofstede himself in his second edition of Culture’s Consequences (2001), which he wrote partly in order to address the criticisms that his work received in the previous twenty years and to demonstrate that his findings are still valid. Our main aim here will be to explore how the discourse generated by Hofstede through his model and his comments on his results constructs the world by dividing it especially according to dichotomies of 'development'/'underdevelopment' and 'modernity'/'tradition'.
|Date of creation:||17 Mar 2006|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Institutet för Ekonomisk Forskning, Box 7080, SE-220 07 LUND, Sweden|
Phone: +46 46-222 32 61
Fax: +46 46-222 34 06
Web page: http://www.lri.lu.se/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:lufewp:2006_002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Elsbeth Andersson)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Elsbeth Andersson to update the entry or send us the correct email address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.