IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhb/hastma/2017_005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gendered References in Organization Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Czarniawska, Barbara

    (Gothenburg Research Institute)

  • Sevón, Guje

    (Dept. of Management and Organization)

Abstract

This text starts with counts of men and women authors quoted in some early and late works of organization theory. An analysis of works of classical authors, and of our own works, reveals that over the years the proportion of references to women’s work has increased, although it is still far from half of the references. The text invites to a discussion about why women authors are systematically underrecognized, and initiates by listing some reasons for why full names in references instead of initials might enhance the proper recognition of research conducted by women.

Suggested Citation

  • Czarniawska, Barbara & Sevón, Guje, 2017. "Gendered References in Organization Studies," SSE Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2017:5, Stockholm School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhb:hastma:2017_005
    Note: A slightly different version of this WP is published as Czarniawska, Barbara & Sevón, Guje: Gendered references in organization studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, Vo. 13 No.2, 2018, pp. 196-200.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://swoba.hhs.se/hastma/paper/hastma2017_005.pdf
    File Function: Complete Rendering
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbara Czarniawska, 2020. "BEYOND RATIONALITY IN ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT Edited by R. McMurray | A. Pullen Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2019, 94 pages, ISBN 9780367233938, hardback £45," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 667-669, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:hastma:2017_005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Helena Lundin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hhstose.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.