IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/her/chedps/15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A preliminary cost utility analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colonic carcinoma, CHERE Discussion Paper No 15

Author

Listed:
  • RD Smith
  • Jane Hall

    (CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney)

  • P Harnett
  • H Gurney

Abstract

In 1990, a study was published (Moertel CG, et al 1990) which recommended a new treatment standard for colon cancer: a 52 week course of adjuvant chemotherapy. The study recommended that such a course of chemotherapy administered after surgical resection could increase five year survival from 55% to 71%. However, this recommendation raised several concerns, particularly about the quality of life of patients undergoing such a long course of chemotherapy and the costs to the health care system of such a prolonged therapy. This paper sought to address both of these issues in the context of an economic evaluation. The cost of surgery plus chemotherapy was estimated and compared with the cost of surgery alone. Descriptions of quality of life were developed from interviews with patients and health professionals, and the time trade off technique was then used to derive utility weights (from a small sample of 16) which were used to adjust length of life to reflect quality, in terms of a "quality adjusted life year" (QALY). Expected survival with and without chemotherapy was based on published data. Chemotherapy increased the total cost of treating a patient with colon cancer by $7,010 per year, from $6,012 to $13,022. The extra benefit gained from the chemotherapy was 2.4 life years. The cost per extra life year gained was therefore $2,920. Incorporating quality of life reduced this gain to 0.36 QALYs. Thus the cost per QALY gained was $19,472. The results of this analysis are only tentative, as the quality of life descriptions were not measured over time, but from a cross sectional survey of patients, and the valuations of health states were derived from a small sample. However, the results do demonstrate the importance of quality of life in the evaluation of cancer treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • RD Smith & Jane Hall & P Harnett & H Gurney, 1993. "A preliminary cost utility analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colonic carcinoma, CHERE Discussion Paper No 15," Discussion Papers 15, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
  • Handle: RePEc:her:chedps:15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.chere.uts.edu.au/pdf/dp15.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1993
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cost utility analysis; chemotherapy; colon cancer;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:her:chedps:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liz Chinchen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chusyau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.