IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-05655383.html

Place-Based Rights and Gentrification: A Vulnerability Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Nathanaël Colin-Jaeger

    (ESPOL-LAB - ESPOL-LAB - ESPOL - European School of Political and Social Sciences / École Européenne de Sciences Politiques et Sociales - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille, AUP - The American University of Paris)

Abstract

This article revises dominant philosophical critiques of gentrification by arguing that placebased accounts identify real moral stakes but do not yet discriminate sharply enough among the different processes gathered under the label of gentrification. Occupancy-based views rightly emphasize the wrong of expulsion and the disruption of located life-plans; recent place-based theories deepen the analysis by distinguishing claims to home, residency, and community. Yet these approaches remain vulnerable to two related difficulties. First, they face a symmetry problem: because many residents, including affluent incumbents, can invoke settled plans, attachments, and community, place-based claims alone do not explain why some cases of neighborhood change are especially wrongful. Second, once these claims are generalized, they place pressure on the theory to justify some form of neighborhood closure or local veto, a pressure that their proponents themselves must resist. I argue that the missing element is vulnerability. Gentrification is paradigmatically wrongful when it proceeds under conditions of both powerlessness and lack of options: affected residents lack effective influence over decisions that structure neighborhood transformation, and they lack viable ways of remaining in place or relocating without excessive burden. The article also clarifies why the value of community should be understood through association, participation, and vulnerability rather than through a freestanding right to neighborhood preservation. This vulnerability-based framework preserves what is compelling in recent place-based arguments while supplying a more discriminating principle for distinguishing clearly wrongful cases of displacement from merely unwelcome, or even permissible, forms of urban change. The article concludes by offering a moral topography of neighborhood change that differentiates clearly wrongful, conditionally wrongful, and generally permissible transformations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathanaël Colin-Jaeger, 2026. "Place-Based Rights and Gentrification: A Vulnerability Approach," Working Papers halshs-05655383, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-05655383
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05655383v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05655383v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-05655383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.