Inequality decomposition using the Gibbs output of a Mixture of lognormal distributions
In this paper we model the income distribution using a Bayesian approach and a mixture of lognormal densities. The size of the mixture is determined by Chib (1995)'s method. Using the Federal Expenditure Survey data for the United Kingdom, we detect three groups corresponding to the three classes (poor, middle class and rich). The marked growth in UK income inequality during the late 1970s is increasingly attracting attention. The increasing gap between the poorest and the richest was accompanied by changes in the clustering of incomes in between. Using the decomposable Generalised Entropy (GE) inequality indices, we carry out a within-between group analysis of income inequality in the three identified groups in UK during 1979 to 1996 and show the evolution of the importance of each group. Whereas during the late 1970s the concentration of people around middle income levels began to break up and polarise towards high and low incomes as shown by Jenkins (1996), our Bayesian results show that the inequality within the low and middle income group do not change much and the importance of the high income is the most affected by the fight against inequality that followed the Thatcher period.
|Date of creation:||12 Apr 2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Note:||View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00585248|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00585248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.