IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-00282844.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contingent Valuation of Competing Public Sector Programmes: An Experiment of Single versus Joint Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Cam Donaldson

    (University of Newcastle - Newcastle University [Newcastle])

  • Stephane Luchini

    (GREQAM - Groupement de Recherche en Économie Quantitative d'Aix-Marseille - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Jean-Paul Moatti

    (Université de la Méditerranée - Aix-Marseille 2, Epidémiologie et Sciences Sociales Appliquées à l'Innovation Médicale - Université de la Méditerranée - Aix-Marseille 2 - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale)

  • Christel Protière

    (Epidémiologie et Sciences Sociales Appliquées à l'Innovation Médicale - Université de la Méditerranée - Aix-Marseille 2 - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale)

Abstract

In this paper, we compare single and joint evaluation (JE) of competing public sector programmes in a contingent valuation exercise. Using survey data aimed at evaluating WTP for cancer interventions (n = 2628), we disantangle two types of effects of JE: informational effects and sequence effects. By the former, wemean: by presenting different programmes to respondents, they will acquire more information on each programme than they would if each programme was valued in isolation. Sequence effects are underisable and induced by the JE exercise itself: changing the order of the valuation sequence induces different WTP values.Our results show that there are informational effects but no sequence effects. We therefore argue that JE approaches can be added to the armoury of techniques aimed at designing better survey instruments in a way that induces informational effects without incurring problems of sequencing.

Suggested Citation

  • Cam Donaldson & Stephane Luchini & Jean-Paul Moatti & Christel Protière, 2008. "Contingent Valuation of Competing Public Sector Programmes: An Experiment of Single versus Joint Evaluation," Working Papers halshs-00282844, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00282844
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00282844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00282844/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00282844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.