Author
Listed:
- Etienne Fouqueray
(RURALITES [Poitiers] - Rural, urbain, acteurs, liens, territoires, environnement, sociétés [UR 13823] - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers, Région Nouvelle-Aquitaine)
- Jeanne Jimenez
(Région Nouvelle-Aquitaine)
- Elodie Massiot
(Région Nouvelle-Aquitaine)
- Coralie Mouffok-Chabe
(AD'OCC - AD'OCC Agence Régionale d’Attractivité et de Développement d’Occitanie)
Abstract
This paper examines the persistence of organic farms in Nouvelle-Aquitaine within a context of crisis marked by a slowdown in conversions and a sharp increase in decertifications since the early 2020s. It aims to assess the magnitude of decertification and to identify its determinants by jointly considering cyclical, structural, and microeconomic factors. The analysis relies on a mixed-methods approach combining a regional database from Agence Bio (nearly 11,000 observations), an original survey of more than 1,000 farms, and qualitative materials (literature review, interviews, and stakeholder exchanges). This framework captures both structural transformations in the sector (demographic changes, competing labels, national and European policies) and recent cyclical pressures (price tensions, product delisting, declining demand), which together shape current decertification dynamics. At the microeconomic level, a binary logit model is used to estimate the probability of remaining in organic farming. The study's originality lies in jointly integrating four dimensions: the irreversibility of production systems (specialization and experience in organic farming), farmers' initial motivations, their perceptions of the sectoral context, and the differentiated role of support schemes at various stages of farm trajectories. The results show that decertification cannot be explained solely by recent shocks or structural trends but emerges from interactions between these factors and farm- and farmer-level characteristics. More strongly committed farms exhibit greater persistence, particularly during periods of crisis. By contrast, motivations driven by economic opportunities and negative perceptions of the national context are associated with a higher likelihood of exit. Public support displays heterogeneous effects depending on its purpose and on farmers' motivations, while location and production orientation reveal differentiated territorial dynamics. These findings underline the need for public policies that are both comprehensive and territorially targeted to address the diversity of situations.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05648929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.