Author
Listed:
- Adrien Deschamps
(AU - Avignon Université, •JPEG - Laboratoire des sciences Juridiques, Politique, Economiques et de Gestion - AU - Avignon Université)
- François Maréchal
(CRESE - Centre de REcherches sur les Stratégies Economiques (UR 3190) - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE])
- Pierre-Henri Morand
(•JPEG - Laboratoire des sciences Juridiques, Politique, Economiques et de Gestion - AU - Avignon Université, FR 3621 - Agorantic - ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - AU - Avignon Université - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
Abstract
Many governments around the world use public procurement as an environmental policy instrument through clauses (i.e., mandatory specifications in the contract performance) and award criteria (i.e., the dimensions of the offers the contracting authority assesses). Green clauses and criteria are often thought to discourage firm participation in procurement procedures. This article evaluates the impact of green clauses and criteria on firm participation from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. From a theoretical standpoint, we show that these instruments have a twofold effect: they may exclude some firms and raise participation costs, while also increasing firm expected margins. We test this prediction empirically using 50,000 procurement procedures in France between 2022 and 2023. We find a robust positive effect of both green clauses and criteria on participation, suggesting that the growing integration of sustainability into public procurement is unlikely to explain the observed decline in participation in procurement procedures.
Suggested Citation
Adrien Deschamps & François Maréchal & Pierre-Henri Morand, 2026.
"Environmental Criteria and Clauses in Public Procurement: Theory and Evidence on their effects on bidder participation,"
Working Papers
hal-05600464, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05600464
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05600464v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05600464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.