IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-05429135.html

Benchmarking WASH Trajectories in Africa: A Comparative Assessment of Six Country Archetypes (2000–2022)
[Analyse comparative des trajectoires WASH en Afrique : Évaluation de six archétypes nationaux (2000–2022)]

Author

Listed:
  • Zo Rivomanana Rasoanaivo

    (Faculty of Sciences, University of Antananarivo, Madagascar.)

Abstract

This dataset and analytical report provide a comparative assessment of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) trajectories across six African countries—Rwanda, Senegal, Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire, Mozambique and Madagascar—over the 2000–2022 period. Using harmonized WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) indicators, World Bank World Development Indicators (WDI) economic data, and UN DESA population estimates, the analysis generates a coherent cross-country benchmark to assess progress, gaps, rural–urban disparities and structural constraints relevant for SDG 6 alignment. The accompanying report synthesizes long-term WASH trends, annual progress rates, sanitation bottlenecks, rural–urban disparities, and differences in performance relative to GDP per capita. A simple costing model provides indicative investment requirements for closing rural basic water gaps in 2022. The nine figures included in this repository document the comparative context, trends, progress rates, SDG trajectory gaps, structural drivers and summary quadrant combining progress and residual deficits. Key findings show that:• all six countries improved WASH access over 2000–2022;• progress rates remain below the pace required to meet SDG 6 by 2030;• sanitation is structurally weaker than drinking water;• rural areas remain the dominant source of national deficits;• income levels do not consistently predict WASH performance;• Madagascar and Côte d'Ivoire show the most severe "low progress / high gap" combination;• Rwanda exhibits an atypical rural sanitation trajectory surpassing urban levels. This repository includes the full analytical report (PDF), the harmonized dataset used in the analysis (CSV), and high-resolution versions of all nine figures (PNG). The materials are intended to support further research, peer review, sector diagnostics and policy discussions related to WASH progress and SDG 6 in Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Zo Rivomanana Rasoanaivo, 2025. "Benchmarking WASH Trajectories in Africa: A Comparative Assessment of Six Country Archetypes (2000–2022) [Analyse comparative des trajectoires WASH en Afrique : Évaluation de six archétypes nationa," Working Papers hal-05429135, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05429135
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17676132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05429135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.