Author
Listed:
- Mathias André
(INSEE - Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE))
- Antoine Sireyjol
(DREES - Direction de la recherche, des études, de l’évaluation et des statistiques [Paris] - Ministère des Solidarités et de la Santé [Paris, France])
Abstract
This study focuses on the budgetary and redistributive effects of spousal and family taxation of income in France. Based on the Ines microsimulation model, it proposes a complete methodology for individualizing income and different tax systems for couples and families. It aims, in particular, to provide detailed information at the level of each percentile of the standard of living and according to the family configuration. This work incorporates recent legislative changes (lowering the family quotient cap, capping credits and tax cuts, changing the discount, abolishing PEP) and updating some of the results relating to the marital quotient (Amar and Guérin 2007, Eidelman 2013). By comparing spousal and family taxation in 2017 to a fictional situation where the tax would be individualized, the results seek to characterize the winners and losers of this conjugal and family taxation according to the standard of living, to calculate the masses. the effects on indicators of inequality and poverty. The results are obtained without posing behavioral hypotheses and with a non constant budgetary envelope. The majority of conjugalization and familialization of income taxes are winners and the effects are massive: 13 million households are winners, for a total effect of 27.7 billion euros. 1.1 million households are also losers, mainly because of conjugalization, not caught up by gains in familialization. About 40% of the total effect is due to conjugalization and 60% to familialization. The average earnings of the winning households amount to € 2,120 per year and losers' losses to € 400. Because of the progressivity of the income tax, the 15% of the wealthiest people are those who benefit the most from the conjugalization: they receive 48% of the total gains while the 50% the most modest receive less than 25 % gains. The net effect of conjugalization increased between 2012 and 2017 as a result of tax reforms, which reduced losses and increased earnings to modest and median households.
Suggested Citation
Mathias André & Antoine Sireyjol, 2019.
"Taxation of couples and families: budgetary and redistributive effects of income tax [Imposition des couples et des familles : effets budgétaires et redistributifs de l'impôt sur le revenu],"
Working Papers
hal-05397460, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05397460
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://insee.hal.science/hal-05397460v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05397460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.