IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-05189756.html

Participatory governance and railway transport planning: what are the challenges for SERMs
[Gouvernance participative et planification du transport ferroviaire : quels enjeux pour les SERM ?]

Author

Listed:
  • Salomé Pinel

    (LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Arcadis)

  • Nathalie Havet

    (LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, LSAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

Abstract

Participatory governance, seen as a key lever to guide and legitimize public action in urban planning and mobility, is at the heart of French Metropolitan Regional Express Services (SERM) projects. However, their specificities - service-oriented, multimodal, multi-scale and multi-stakeholder - make their planning more complex, without a theoretical or operational framework being clearly established. This article sheds light on these issues through a critical review of participatory approaches in railway transport planning, whether mandatory or voluntary. It also relies on an in-depth analysis of the Clermont-Auvergne SERM, where focus groups and mapping tools are evaluated for their contribution to co-design. Our review shows that participatory approaches for infrastructure planning, whether mandatory or voluntary, often remain limited to top-down information sharing, with weak integration into project engineering. Voluntary approaches to service planning seem better suited but are rare. For SERM-type projects, despite tools better suited to capture service dynamics and territorial complexity, participation remains uneven and poorly integrated into decision-making. The case study highlights the value of an anticipated, progressive and visual approach, promoting iteration, understanding of the issues, and co-construction of proposals. It also reveals the persistent limitations of innovative geo-governance approaches that hinder co-design: lack of inclusion, weak appropriation, and absence of methodological framework. The proposed recommendations aim to structure an active, reproducible participatory method tailored to multicriteria criteria planning of complex services like SERM, within a dynamic of cross-fertilization between research and action to realize the participatory ambition.

Suggested Citation

  • Salomé Pinel & Nathalie Havet, 2025. "Participatory governance and railway transport planning: what are the challenges for SERMs [Gouvernance participative et planification du transport ferroviaire : quels enjeux pour les SERM ?]," Working Papers hal-05189756, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05189756
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05189756v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05189756v2/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05189756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.