Author
Listed:
- Flore Verbist
(VITO - Flemish Institute for Technological Research)
- Emma Jagu Schippers
(LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - CentraleSupélec - Université Paris-Saclay)
- Injy Johnstone
(Smith School for Enterprise and the Environment - University of Oxford)
- Coline Seralta
(LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - CentraleSupélec - Université Paris-Saclay)
- Romain Presty
(LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - CentraleSupélec - Université Paris-Saclay)
- Antigoni Theocharidou
(Imperial College London)
Abstract
Purpose of review: Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) is deemed critical to achieve the climate targets set by the Paris Agreement, underscoring the need for robust and scalable CDR markets. This review explores how CDR has been, and could increasingly be, integrated into existing and emerging carbon markets. Summary: The report provides an overview of the role of CDR across three types of carbon market mechanisms: voluntary, quasi-compliance, and compliance-based systems. It highlights the defining features and interconnections among these markets, and assesses how each framework contributes to the deployment of removals, in particular novel CDR. While voluntary markets serve as innovation hubs for CDR, their limited scalability and voluntary nature highlight the importance of compliance markets and targeted policy support for permanent CDR. Those quasi-compliance and compliance markets, including mechanisms under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and Emissions Trading Systems (ETS) like UK and EU ETS, are beginning to incorporate CDR more explicitly. This signals a shift toward broader carbon market integration and geographical coverage, requiring robust accounting and certification procedures for both emission reduction and removal projects. Recent findings: Despite growing policy attention, the deployment of CDR, especially permanent forms, remains marginal and challenging to scale within existing carbon pricing and crediting frameworks. Although certification schemes are becoming more tailored to the unique characteristics of different CDR approaches, cost disparities between permanent removal credits and cheaper emissions avoidance credits continue to hinder uptake. In response, several jurisdictions are exploring hybrid policy models that combine market-based mechanisms with public financial support. Additionally, increasing interlinkages between carbon market mechanisms are expected to facilitate more effective and widespread integration of CDR over time.
Suggested Citation
Flore Verbist & Emma Jagu Schippers & Injy Johnstone & Coline Seralta & Romain Presty & Antigoni Theocharidou, 2025.
"Market Mechanisms for Carbon Dioxide Removals: An Overview,"
Working Papers
hal-05155011, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05155011
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05155011v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05155011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.