Author
Listed:
- Sophie Louey
(CED - Centre Émile Durkheim - IEP Bordeaux - Sciences Po Bordeaux - Institut d'études politiques de Bordeaux - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CEET - Centre d'études de l'emploi et du travail - Cnam - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [Cnam] - M.E.N.E.S.R. - Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche - Ministère du Travail, de l'Emploi et de la Santé, CSO - Centre de sociologie des organisations (Sciences Po, CNRS) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
Abstract
In France, teleworking has been the subject of numerous agreements, following a top-down hierarchy of joint negotiation levels. At the European level, a first framework agreement was concluded in 2002. At the national level, a first interprofessional national agreement (ANI) was signed in 2005. At the company level, it was mainly in the 2010s and even more so after 2020 – during and after the Covid-19 health crisis – that many agreements were concluded. At the sector level, however, very few agreements have been produced. If the Labor Law and the 2017 Macron ordinances give primacy to company-level agreements over sector-level agreements on this topic, one can then question what the stakes might be in negotiating and producing a teleworking agreement at this level. This article therefore examines the dynamics of negotiating a sector-level teleworking agreement (in the insurance sector), testing a recently defended thesis according to which social dialogue is now exercised under increased "control" from the State and employers. Based on this case of negotiated teleworking, it analyzes the tensions that the national and company levels exert on the sector (2). It then notes that, despite these tensions, the sector-level agreement constitutes a space that carries two types of internal and external stakes: producing a framework agreement internally; and promoting the sector externally (3). Overall, it appears that, while the sector is a level of negotiation whose usefulness is rather questioned by some of the negotiators representing employees, it is, conversely, defended by employers as a space for producing resources for companies in the sector.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-05591147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Contact - Sciences Po Department of Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.