IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/psewpa/halshs-04978077.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Données brutes d'observation des Conférences citoyennes régionales du Grand débat national (France, 2019)

Author

Listed:
  • Bénédicte Apouey

    (PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris)

  • Jean-Michel Fourniau

    (Université Gustave Eiffel, GIS Démocratie et participation - Partenaires IRSTEA - IRSTEA - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture)

Abstract

Eighteen Regional Citizens' Conferences (CCR) (13 in metropolitan regions and five in overseas departments and regions (DROM)) and one National Citizens' Conference dedicated to youth were held during the second phase of the Great National Debate (GDN) (either on March 15-16, 2019, or on March 22-23, 2019). A total of 1,404 people participated: 1,216 in the 13 metropolitan CCRs, 68 in the National Youth Conference (selected through a national lottery based on phone numbers), and 120 in the five DROM CCRs (recruited specifically for each of these territories). For mainland France, this was the largest "random selection" conducted to form a mini-public. This report first presents the recruitment process, commonly referred to as the "random selection." It then describes the observation protocol for the Conferences (set up by the Debate Observatory), as well as the process of administering the questionnaires (by the facilitation and research teams). We then compare the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants in the Citizens' Conferences with those of the population in France, which leads us to note that the Conferences were not representative of the population. Specifically, we observe an over-representation of men, people aged 35 to 64, executives/liberal professions, and intermediate professions in the metropolitan Citizens' Conferences. In contrast, certain population groups were under-represented among the participants in the metropolitan Conferences: women, young people aged 18 to 35, and manual workers. This lack of representativeness raises questions about the descriptive legitimacy of the Conferences. Finally, this document presents the (blank) questionnaires used by the facilitation and research teams, as well as the descriptive statistics of the responses given by the citizens to these questionnaires.

Suggested Citation

  • Bénédicte Apouey & Jean-Michel Fourniau, 2025. "Données brutes d'observation des Conférences citoyennes régionales du Grand débat national (France, 2019)," PSE Working Papers halshs-04978077, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-04978077
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04978077v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04978077v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-04978077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.