IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/pseptp/halshs-05845470.html

Women’s preferences for cervical cancer screening methods: a discrete choice experiment in Estonia and France

Author

Listed:
  • Violette Delisle

    (CESP - Centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations - UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines - AP-HP - Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris - AP-HP - Hôpital Paul Brousse - AP-HP - Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Lise Rochaix

    (PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris)

  • Marc Bardou

    (CIC1432 - Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1432 (Dijon) - Module Plurithématique : Périnatalité Cancérologie Handicap et Ophtalmologie - Direction Générale de l'Organisation des Soins (DGOS) - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - UBE - Université Bourgogne Europe)

  • Anneli Uusküla

    (Tartu Ülikool = University of Tartu [Estonie])

  • Anna Tisler

    (Tartu Ülikool = University of Tartu [Estonie])

  • Carine Franc

    (CESP - Centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations - UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines - AP-HP - Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris - AP-HP - Hôpital Paul Brousse - AP-HP - Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - Université Paris-Saclay)

Abstract

Background This study explores women's preferences for cervical cancer screening (CCS) in Estonia and France, particularly preferences for self-sampling (SS). Although many European countries have introduced organized CCS, screening behaviours still exhibit a strong social gradient, with CC disproportionately affecting populations facing barriers to access, such as low income, rural residence, migration status or low education. The WHO has set a goal of eliminating CC and has proposed different strategies of invitations, outreach campaigns and the introduction of SS as a potential lever to increase uptake. Methods To assess whether these CCS strategies align with women's preferences, we conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) in Estonia and France. Pooling our data (N = 4774), we used a two-stage decision-making framework; first, intervention preferences were assessed, and then the willingness to participate if preferred interventions were implemented was measured. We also conducted a heterogeneity analysis via latent class analysis. The DCE has three attributes: invitation methods, sampling methods (physician-based sampling or self-sampling), and awareness-raising campaigns. The results were analysed using a mixed multinomial logit model to capture heterogeneity in preferences and explore factors influencing CCS participation. Results The results show that the implementation of SS would: 1) increase uptake among women facing geographical barriers to CCS, 2) help engage first-time screeners in a screening pathway and 3) possibly deter participation from women already engaged in their screening pathway if implemented as sole mean of screening. Conclusions Our results thus advocate for tailored screening programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Violette Delisle & Lise Rochaix & Marc Bardou & Anneli Uusküla & Anna Tisler & Carine Franc, 2026. "Women’s preferences for cervical cancer screening methods: a discrete choice experiment in Estonia and France," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-05845470, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:pseptp:halshs-05845470
    DOI: 10.1186/s12905-026-04478-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:pseptp:halshs-05845470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Caroline Bauer The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Caroline Bauer to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.